Reliability Intelligence Assessment
Know what your maintenance data actually proves.
A fixed-scope, 6–8 week assessment that turns the maintenance records you already have into a defensible reliability baseline, evidence-graded findings, prioritized opportunities, and a 90-day action plan—without installing software or giving SyncAI access to your production systems.
Standard assessment scope
- Assets
- Up to 500 assets
- History
- Up to 36 months
- Records
- Up to 250,000 maintenance records
- Workshops
- Three structured customer workshops
- Deployment credit
- Up to US$15,000 toward a qualifying SyncAI deployment initiated within 90 days
No software installation.
No credentials.
No production-system access.
No unsupported ROI.
The problem
Maintenance systems can produce numbers without proving the decision behind them.
Asset hierarchies drift. Dealer and OEM work may sit outside the CMMS. Failure codes become inconsistent. Downtime context can be incomplete. A dashboard can still produce a precise MTBF, PM-compliance percentage, or savings estimate even when the source evidence is not decision-grade.
SyncAI starts with one rule: if the evidence cannot support the conclusion, we say so.
You provide exports only
What you receive
A management-ready reliability baseline, not a generic AI report.
01
Executive Reliability Brief
02
Criticality Register
03
Failure Taxonomy & Mapping
04
Evidence Integrity Matrix
05
Reliability Performance Baseline
06
Bad-Actor / Repeat-Failure Analysis
07
Reliability Opportunity Register
08
Executive Decision Register
09
90-Day Action Plan
10
Final Executive Workshop
Illustrative proof
The output is designed to support decisions, not decorate a dashboard.
The supplied illustrative report uses synthetic data and no customer information. It demonstrates the expected structure: executive findings, severity and confidence kept separate, evidence-integrity status, and an explicit decision or evidence-closure action.
Illustrative synthetic example — no customer data represented
Northstar Equipment Rental — sample
Executive Reliability Brief
Synthetic example for sales demonstrations. The sample separates fleet-level facts from unsupported component-life conclusions and makes the decision boundary explicit.
Finding
Repeat aftertreatment faults concentrated in one truck family
Severity / confidence
High / High
Decision
Approve focused RCA before parts or strategy change
Evidence Integrity Summary
Asset identity — SUPPORTED
Failure coding — PARTIALLY SUPPORTED
Evidence Integrity Standard
Every material conclusion gets an evidence grade.
Severity and confidence are kept separate. A high-consequence issue can still have low confidence; in that case, the lowest-regret action may be to secure the missing evidence rather than claim causality.
Supported
Evidence is sufficiently complete and internally consistent for the stated conclusion.
Can support a management decision subject to normal engineering authority.
Partially supported
The direction may be useful, but one or more material limitations remain.
Use for prioritization; close the named evidence gap before an irreversible action.
Unsupported
The available records cannot defend the requested conclusion.
Do not decide from the metric. Secure the missing evidence first.
Best fit
Built for bounded reliability questions in asset-intensive operations.
Commercial structure
US$35,000
Fixed fee · 6–8 weeks · Standard flagship scope
The assessment is a bounded product, not open-ended consulting. Out-of-scope custom analysis is separately scoped rather than allowed to expand the engagement indefinitely.
Multi-site, multi-fleet, portfolio, and cross-domain assessments are available under an enterprise scope.
From assessment to continuous intelligence
Establish the governed baseline first. Operationalize only what the evidence supports.
01
Assess
Establish the canonical asset, failure, evidence, opportunity, and decision baseline.
02
Operationalize
Select one to three high-confidence workflows to move into governed SyncAI execution.
03
Verify & expand
Track 30/60/90-day outcomes, verify value, and expand only where the operating evidence justifies it.
Questions buyers ask
Assessment FAQ
Do you need access to our production systems?
No. The Standard assessment is designed around customer-provided exports. SyncAI does not require production credentials or direct CMMS/EAM access for the fixed-scope assessment.
What data is typically required?
The usual starting set is an asset register, work-order history, PM plans or task library, downtime or meter history, relevant dealer/OEM records, and an operating measure such as utilization, production, or OEE where available.
What happens if our data quality is poor?
That is part of the product. Material conclusions are graded Supported, Partially Supported, or Unsupported. Missing or conflicting evidence is documented rather than hidden behind a precise-looking metric.
Is the assessment a software deployment?
No. It is a bounded reliability intelligence product. If the findings support continuous workflows, one to three high-confidence use cases can move into a separately governed SyncAI deployment.
Does the assessment guarantee savings or ROI?
No. SyncAI does not manufacture savings claims where the evidence cannot support them. The assessment establishes a defensible baseline, identifies opportunities, and defines how value should be verified.
Start with scope
Request a 30-minute assessment call.
We will confirm the bounded asset domain, the records available, the management question, and whether the Standard assessment is the right commercial fit.
Customer-specific security representations are made against the actual environment and agreed scope. SyncAI does not rely on unverified certification or deployment claims.